It’s not hidden from anyone the disastrous negative effects of
smoking on the health and the wealth of people. “About
440,000 people in the United States die each year from smoking – and
tobacco-related illnesses, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)” (Pappa.
10). Sadly enough, most smokers overspend on buying their own destruction from
their hard earned money. Additionally, over $300 million is spent on “smoking-caused
healthcare and Medicaid” on daily basis (Guilfoyle). It’s
interesting that the ban on indoor smoking is increasingly taking effect. It is
a good step taken toward protecting the wellbeing of the public, mainly the
nonsmokers. However, the visibility of that dangerous habit still remains a
living tragic challenge to the health of the present and future generations in
the form of public smoking. It’s an unavoidable temptation in the face of the
youngsters, a hindrance on the way of those with the intentions to quit
smoking, a risk to the health of nonsmokers in general, and a big contributor
to the litter of the environment.
Children are the most susceptible individuals in societies. Social
norms are their biggest teachers. They easily adopt the behaviors of the
adults. When kids see people, they consider to be their role models, smoking
every here and there, they won’t hesitate to translate the action as a glorious
one which defines what an adult should do and thus start copying it. For instance,
studies show that most smokers started smoking at an early age. “According to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, more than
90 percent of adult smokers start smoking as teens, or younger” (Pappa. 10). In
one of its daily tolls of tobacco use in the U.S, the campaign also publishes
that more than “4,000 kids try their first cigarette each day” and more than
“1,000 kids become regular daily smokers each day” (Guilfoyle). That’s a painful reality. If the visibility of
smoking is limited by putting a strict ban on smoking in all public spaces, a
lot of innocent little children will be saved.
It’s true that there are some smokers who wouldn’t think of
quitting, but the reality is that their number is almost negligible compared to
the large mass of smokers who wake up every morning with the intention to not
light up any more cigarettes. The ban can be an effective factor to help those
brave people who want to transform their lives from the regretful lives of
cigarette smoking to healthier and smoke-free ones. It’s regretful, because the
smoker hears, reads and watches the awareness campaigns against smoking every
day – your health is in danger; you’re on the verge of getting cancer; if you
don’t stop, there are high chances that smoking will take you to your grave and
similar shocking statements pass by him almost every day. Smokers can feel the
pain it takes to find yourself in the situation of wanting to quit while the
public is not letting you because it’s enjoying a legal smoking habit to
contaminate all your surroundings – even when you go to school there’s a big
invitation attracting you to smoke. Banning smoking in all outside public
spaces will not only save a great number of children from falling into the
hazardous environment of smoking, but also help a lot of smokers take the
courage to quit.
Generally speaking, the ban will also create a healthier smoke-free
environment and reduce the risk of second-hand-smoking (SHS). The SHS is real.
It’s not just possible in indoor places, but outdoor places as well. A recent
study conducted by
prominent scholars from number of Universities and centers of environmental
health in the U.S revealed the effects of smoking in outside spaces on the
health of nonsmokers. The researchers “assigned 28 participants to outdoor
patios of a restaurant and a bar and an open-air site with no smokers on three
weekend days… and collected saliva and urine samples immediately before and
after the visits (post-exposure) and on the following morning and analyzed
samples for cotinine and total NNAL, respectively” (Gideon St. Helen et al. 1010). The research concludes that “Salivary
cotinine and urinary NNAL increased significantly in nonsmokers after outdoor
SHS exposure… such exposures may increase risks of health effects associated
with tobacco carcinogens” (Gideon St.
Helen et al. 1010). Since public smoking is a great risk to the health of the public, a
ban should be placed on it for the sake of the wellbeing of the public.
Another negative outcome of public smoking is its contribution to
the litter of the environment. Cigarette butts are found almost everywhere.
They damage the beauty of our country’s public spaces. According to the
nonprofit group Keep America Beautiful, “Cigarette butts are the most frequently
littered item. Tobacco products comprise 38% of all U.S. roadway litter and 30%
at ‘transition points,’ places where smokers must discontinue smoking before
proceeding.” While it’s true that cleaning up cigarette butts from public
spaces is an effective tool, a ban on public smoking is more effective, as it
puts an end to the availability of cigarette butts in our beautiful environment
in the first place.
Some smokers
almost get upset by the very moment this topic is raised. They argue that it
infringes personal freedom. But if this is a point, then it’s like saying
smokers’ freedom – to smoke in every outdoor spot – is more important than the
health of the public and the beauty of the environment. That’s a selfish and
cruel stance on the issue. If adult smokers like to put their own selves in
risk, they are free to do so, but they shouldn’t be allowed to put others –
especially children – in the same situation. Similarly, they shouldn’t be
allowed to hold back those smokers who want to escape from it.
In conclusion, cigarette smoking is not just
bad for smokers, but rather for both the people and the land. When the
publicity of smoking continues, the consequences are severely harsh. It’s a big
risk to the health of the nonsmokers – both children and adults. It also
distorts the image of our beautiful environment. Public smoking has to be
banned in order for our society to be healthier and wealthier, and our
environment to be more beautiful than ever.
Works Cited
Gideon St.
Helen, J et al. "Exposure to Secondhand Smoke Outside of a Bar and a
Restaurant and Tobacco Exposure Biomarkers in Nonsmokers." Environmental
Health Perspectives, Vol. 120, No. 7 (JULY 2012), pp. 1010-1016.
Brogan & Partners. Web. 16 Apr. 2013.
Guilfoyle, Jessica. "THE DAILY TOLL OF TOBACCO USE IN
THE USA." Campaign For Tobacco-Free Kids 122106 (2011): n.pag.
Daily Toll. Web. 17 April 2013.
Pappa, Lauren. "Why do teens smoke? Despite the risks, many
kids are still lighting up. Why?" Junior Scholastic 28 Nov. 2005:
10+. General OneFile. Web. 10 Apr. 2013.
"Results
from the Nation’s Largest Litter Study." Www.kab.org. Keep America
Beautiful, Jan. 2010. Web. 16 Apr. 2013.
<http://www.kab.org/site/DocServer/LitterFactSheet_CIGARETTE.pdf?docID=5182>.
No comments:
Post a Comment